Natural Products Insider is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Tuesday is deadline to save CBD from DEA clutches

Hemp Field 2019
Comment period ends Oct. 20 to rein in DEA regulatory overreach—seriously, the drug warriors were explicitly written out of regulating hemp in the 2018 Farm Bill. Why are we here?

The 2018 Farm Bill explicitly wrote the nation’s top drug warriors, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), out of regulating hemp. But the DEA has insinuated itself back into the picture with an interim final rule that is having a chilling effect on farmers and extractors the nation over.

The situation could not be more dire. The Hemp Industries Association (HIA), which successfully sued the DEA in 2004 to get the agency to stop declaring hemp seeds and hemp seed oil as a controlled substance alongside heroin and cocaine, filed suit last week to again push back against the reefer madness kingpins.

“The DEA’s new rule could put us out of business overnight,” said Janel Ralph, founder of leading CBD line Palmetto Harmony, which merged with RE Botanicals, which co-signed the lawsuit along with the HIA.

The comment period to oppose the DEA’s overreach is Tuesday, Oct. 20. More than 3,000 comments have already been filed. To file your own comment, go here.

Besides the opposition to the DEA having any authority at all to regulate hemp, the industry is most concerned that the agency believes that felonies are committed any step along the extraction process that hemp may have parts that rise above 0.3% THC.

When Congress passed the 2018 farm bill, it explicitly carved hemp and its derivatives out of the Controlled Substances Act so that hemp can be regulated as an agricultural commodity,” said HIA President Rick Trojan. “The DEA’s interim final rule could create substantial barriers to the legal manufacturing of hemp-derived products, a critical component of the hemp supply chain, and devastate the entire hemp industry. Although the DEA states that is not its intention, the rule must be amended to ensure hemp remains an agricultural crop, as Congress intended.”

Hemp extractors and processors are the part of the supply chain most concerned with the DEA proposed rule. Part of the complaint is hemp waste material and end process material is defined as hemp. These are non-publicly available material before it is made available to retail or wholesale.

“This is not the finished product. It’s an injustice,” said Robert Davidson, CEO of CURE Pharmaceuticals. “It doesn’t reflect how the supply chain works. It makes absolutely no sense to me. Because they don’t treat drugs or nutraceuticals like that. I get sildenafil and I’m not giving a kilo of that to a person but in a dose that’s regulated. This is the case, the opportunity, to get the DEA out of hemp.”

The petition filed by the HIA and RE Botanicals on Oct. 16 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit asks the court to review the DEA interim final rule, “Implementation of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018,” which was promulgated by the DEA on Aug. 21.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.