Mannatech Under Possible Investigation in Texas

10/31/2006 4:07:13 PM
ARTICLE TOOLS

HOUSTON--Mannatech (NASDAQ:MTEX) is reportedly being investigated by the Texas Office of the Attorney General (AG) for possible deceptive trade practices. In an Oct. 24 response to a public information request by a MTEX stock short-seller, the AG confirmed the company is being looked at for unapproved health claims.

"Mannatech has made unproven health claims about its products, such as the ability to cure cancer and numerous other ailments," the AG's office wrote. "The claims are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), making the claims potentially in violation of both state and federal law."

Mannatech, a direct sales company with a worldwide network of 350,000 distributors and nearly $400 million in 2005 sales, markets products such as Ambrotose, a glyconutrient that "supports cell-to-cell communications." Customers in Texas have claimed Mannatech sales personnel circulate misinformation about the benefits of products such as Ambrotose. Complaints include a mother of a child with Down syndrome who was given a brochure by a company salesperson that stated the product could improve the health and change facial features of children with the chromosomal anomaly.

Various reports have noted three Nobel Prize-winning scientists have complained to New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer that their research has been improperly hyperlinked to Mannatech's dietary supplements through the Ambrotose Web sites.

Also, Mannatech was sued in 2004 in California for fraud and invasion of privacy, after they continued to promote their products using a photograph of a mother of a child who died of Tay-Sachs disease, long after the child, who used Mannatech products, died in 1997.

Mannatech issued a statement on Oct. 30, saying it had not been contacted by the Texas AG regarding any investigation. The company also reiterated its commitment to work with all regulating agencies. "The company believes its compliance programs are taken very seriously by its employees and its associates, and are a pivotal aspect of its continued success," the company stated.

Comments

1

Charmaine 11/06/2006 21:21

Some Christian friends of mine (and I'm a Christian also) convinced a
single mother on welfare that we knew to buy their Mannatech products
at the cost of $400/month. Mannatech, admittedly, is not a cure, just a
supplement. Are people supposed to believe that said mother wouldn't
benefit more by buying $400 worth of healthy food instead of
supplements that in the end did her no good? That woman died of ovarian
cancer about a year later and I have lost all respect for those
"friends" who were more interested in pushing their product than caring
for a friend and her boy. Also, they tried to sell to an elderly single
woman on a very limited income that we knew. Mannatech pushes their
junk in churches and preys on the weakest of people - I can't wait for
them to fail miserably, and they will, because God is not mocked and
they will reap what they sow.

2

Gary Puckett 11/06/2006 16:15




I found this interesting...




From: drmondoa@mac.com
To: pharral@star-telegram.com
Cc: letters@star-telegram.com; RobRaysanders@star-telegram.com
















Dear Sir:














Last weekend, I came across your article about Glyconutrients, Mannatech and Ambrotose.  The article quotes some eminent scientists, who claim that glyconutrients or Ambrotose is just a sugar pill, does not work and is unproven. Frankly they over reached, because a scientist can only say one thing with certainty about it: that it has not been subjected to rigorous clinical trials. 














Quite by chance,  10 years ago, I encountered glyconutrients for the first time, when my health broke down, as a result of completing the foolhardy feat of working full time as a hospital physician and studying full time for a masters degree.  I felt as if I invented the 30 hour day! Concerned about getting on long term steroids and becoming a chronic invalid, I searched for another way and tried various things over about a year. The only measure that made a significant and rapid difference to my beleaguered immunity and dwindling energy was when I started using glyconutrients. I am a trained physician, and recognized the power of placebo. One odd thing was that placebo did not appear to kick in when I did other things.  






 


After encountering many other people with similar experiences, I decided to look for corroboration and an explanation for what I was seeing. One consequence of that search, is a book, "Sugars That Heal", that was published by Random House in 2001. What I found, were compelling scientific nuggets from all over the world, that together suggest that consuming sugars in their staggering diversity can have dramatic effects on health.  Special care was taken not to make "Sugars That Heal" a book about Mannatech, and none of its over 200 sources are from Mannatech.






 


Many scientists in the field of glycobiology are understandably upset, when their work is misquoted by some Mannatech Associates and widely distributed on the web. Their work shows that sugars are extremely important and are present in most cell structures and most cell interactions. What their work has not examined is how a nutritional intervention with a variety of sugars makes any difference to those natural processes and they do not want people to make unproven assumptions.






 


What is my attitude about this a doctor? Medicine is an art, that strives to be scientifically based. What do I mean? A real doctor does what it takes to bring comfort and healing to his or her patient and to avoid causing harm. Although we try to practice evidence based medicine, only a small fraction of what we do is based on rock solid evidence. While we try to use statistically based evidence, we do not treat statistics but complex people, each different from the other, and whose suffering cannot wait 10 years until all the facts have come in about their condition. 






 


I have seen enough to recommend glyconutrients as nutritional supplementation for both well and sick people, but never as a substitute for established therapy.  Meanwhile, I am working to bring funding and independent researchers together to settle some of these questions.  From a basic science perspective, we know a lot more about what sugars do in the cell and body than 90 percent of substances that are given to people as food or treatment. 






 


Finally, I have a word for the scientist who asserted that somehow people who ch


3

Dorothy Ackles 11/01/2006 20:28

Stock manipulation for sure.  I too am disappointed that INSIDER followed suit.  Respect for publication taken down a couple of notches.

4

Gary Puckett 11/01/2006 09:03


If a complaint comes in, they investigate, it’s their job, but look who did the complaining…  “The public information request was made by someone who short-sells Mannatech stock. Short-selling is the practice of borrowing stock and selling it, expecting its price to go down so the short seller can by it back at a lower price and pocket the difference”. 












I believe it should be illegal, promoting BAD not always true PRESS to make a profit




.  








I'm also surprised Natural Products INSIDER got sucked into the deal by helping the short seller get their message out more. 








My comment is: Lets see how much of the PRESS issues another story updating their readers when Mannatech is shown to be clear.  I will say NONE, because BAD news, not good news sells!




Post a Comment

 

announcements